1. Of the five factors mentioned in the Pratkanis report, which one do you think is the strongest explanation for why people fall "victim" to so-called subliminal influence. Explain why.
I believe the strongest explanation would be belief of a powerful unconscious. When at a loss for an explanation of ones actions, It is easiest to claim that the motives came from an unconscious force. This explanation connects all the dots without having to find real evidence- which makes it convincing.
2. Which factor do you think is the weakest of Pratkanis' arguments? Explain why.
I find the weakest factor to be that subliminal persuasion is an irrational force uncontrollable by the recipient. This idea just illustrates ones lack of self control. The idea of an "uncontrollable force" in this instance is merely an excuse for one's gluttony.
3. Do you believe subliminal advertising exists? Have Pratkanis influenced your opinion. Why or why not?
I believe subliminal advertising exists- but not to a full extent. Pratikanis brought my attention to the tactics used but he did not change my opinion of them. I believe a person with less knowledge of a specific subject might be more susceptible to subliminal influence than another with a better understanding of the given subject. it has the power to influence perceptions but can not completely change them/control them.